Topic summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video1,324 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Customer Relations results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 2,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,346 of 16,559 topics). This Customer Relations is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Customer Relations
Topic details
Total words: 3,972
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos