Topic summary
62% 2 analyzed articles/videos 643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Customer Engagement results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 763 hits . Analysis detected 3,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,684 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 59% (6,918 of 16,562 topics). This Customer Engagement is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Customer Engagement
Topic details
Total words: 3,684
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.2% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 20.7% 20.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst