Topic summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Culinary Guide results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Bandwagon , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 1,040 hits . Analysis detected 7,050 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of â 44% (9,388 of 16,562 topics). This Culinary Guide is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Culinary Guide
Topic details
Total words: 8,548
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Attempt to Sell a Product⌠Sitewide 0.5% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst