Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Cuisine results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 415 hits. Analysis detected 3,754 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,425 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Cuisine is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Cuisine
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,425
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos