Topic summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video1,640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cu Buffs results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 218 hits. Analysis detected 1,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (22,879 of 23,370 topics). This Cu Buffs is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group.
Cu Buffs
Topic details
Total words: 6,560
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

2% percentile
02550751002.1% percentile
0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos