Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cryptocurrency Profits results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 258 hits. Analysis detected 1,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,162 of 16,562 topics). This Cryptocurrency Profits is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Cryptocurrency Profits
Topic details
Total words: 1,384
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.6%18.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.6%17.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos