Topic summary
ā 41%1 analyzed article/video1,126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cruise Ship Health results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 283 hits. Analysis detected 2,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,378 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ā 25% (12,537 of 16,562 topics). This Cruise Ship Health is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Cruise Ship Health
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 25%Cruise Ship Health (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,378
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos