Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crowdsourcing results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 470 hits . Analysis detected 3,005 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,880 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,545 of 16,562 topics). This Crowdsourcing is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Crowdsourcing
Topic details
Total words: 2,880
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst