Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crowd results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 243 hits. Analysis detected 1,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,748 of 16,562 topics). This Crowd is worse (more manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group.
Crowd
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,376
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.4% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.4%16.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.7%17.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.1%Composition/Division: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos