Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Critique Of Wokeism results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Straw Man , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 357 hits . Analysis detected 2,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Critique Of Wokeism is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Critique Of Wokeism
Topic details
Total words: 4,044
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Straw Man: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst