Topic summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos849 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Critical Minerals results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and False Dilemma, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 359 hits. Analysis detected 3,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,383 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,542 of 16,559 topics). This Critical Minerals is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Critical Minerals
Topic details
Total words: 4,383
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos