Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video580 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Criminal Negligence results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 145 hits. Analysis detected 863 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,475 of 16,562 topics). This Criminal Negligence is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Criminal Negligence
Topic details
Total words: 2,320
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos