Topic summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crime Prevention results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 3,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,807 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,756 of 16,562 topics). This Crime Prevention is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Crime Prevention
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,807
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.7%6.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos