Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crime Courts results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,151 hits. Analysis detected 5,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,040 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,917 of 16,562 topics). This Crime Courts is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Crime Courts
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,040
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.3%14.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos