Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Creative Technology results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 971 hits. Analysis detected 6,353 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,744 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (5,572 of 15,448 topics). This Creative Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Creative Technology
Topic details
Total words: 4,744
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.9% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 18.8%18.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.5%20.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.7%12.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.4%7.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos