Topic summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cpus results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Overconfidence Bias , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 156 hits . Analysis detected 1,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (5,174 of 16,562 topics). This Cpus is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Cpus
Topic details
Total words: 1,452
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.8% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst