Topic summary
⁠43%3 analyzed articles/videos6,049 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Covid 19 Origins results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 2,254 hits. Analysis detected 13,696 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,611 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (20,302 of 23,376 topics). This Covid 19 Origins is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Covid 19 Origins
Topic details
Total words: 22,611
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510013.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles22.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos