Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 869 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Covid 19 Litigation results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 873 hits . Analysis detected 3,968 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,607 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 86% (2,201 of 15,329 topics). This Covid 19 Litigation is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Covid 19 Litigation
Topic details
Total words: 2,607
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.6% percentile 7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 33.5% 33.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Topic 33.5%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst