Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video824 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Courtroom Access results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 2,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (6,989 of 15,149 topics). This Courtroom Access is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Courtroom Access
Topic details
Total words: 2,472
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos