Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cotton Bowl results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 177 hits . Analysis detected 1,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,121 of 16,562 topics). This Cotton Bowl is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group. Cotton Bowl
Topic details
Total words: 780
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.2% percentile 7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles780 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 17.6% 17.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 16.7% 16.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 9.4% 9.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 22.7% 22.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 19.2% Recency Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.6% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Special Pleading: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.3% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst