Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Cost Cutting results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 230 faulty-reasoning hits from 938 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,485 topics). This Cost Cutting is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Cost Cutting
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 938
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles938 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos