Topic summary
73%2 analyzed articles/videos696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corruption Allegations results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 655 hits. Analysis detected 3,483 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,510 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,850 of 16,562 topics). This Corruption Allegations is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Corruption Allegations
Topic details
Total words: 3,510
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos