Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Corrections results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 513 hits. Analysis detected 3,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,753 topics). This Corrections is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Corrections
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.1%15.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos