Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,039 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Ownership results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 542 hits. Analysis detected 3,529 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,413 of 16,562 topics). This Corporate Ownership is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Corporate Ownership
Topic details
Total words: 4,156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos