Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video999 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Influence On Government results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 1,232 hits. Analysis detected 10,475 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,237 of 16,562 topics). This Corporate Influence On Government is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Corporate Influence On Government
Topic details
Total words: 3,996
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510086.5% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 30.8%30.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 29.4%29.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 18.0%18.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.1%16.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 13.3%13.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.3%9.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.4%12.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Topic 30.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos