Topic summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video561 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Espionage results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 541 hits. Analysis detected 1,698 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,683 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,487 of 16,562 topics). This Corporate Espionage is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Corporate Espionage
Topic details
Total words: 1,683
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 32.1%32.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 32.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos