Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video522 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Competition results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 409 hits. Analysis detected 2,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,805 of 16,562 topics). This Corporate Competition is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Corporate Competition
Topic details
Total words: 1,536
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.1% percentile
8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 21.2%21.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 19.1%19.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.6%26.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.9%10.9%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 5.2%5.2%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 3.7%3.7%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.6%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Red Herring: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos