Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 590 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corals results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 248 hits . Analysis detected 1,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,469 of 16,343 topics). This Corals is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. Corals
Topic details
Total words: 2,360
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.2% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst