Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video590 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corals results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 248 hits. Analysis detected 1,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,469 of 16,343 topics). This Corals is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Corals
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,360
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos