Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conversion Therapy results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 1,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,240 of 16,562 topics). This Conversion Therapy is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Conversion Therapy
Topic details
Total words: 2,104
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Middle Ground: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos