Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Content Strategy results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 728 hits. Analysis detected 6,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,874 of 16,562 topics). This Content Strategy is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Content Strategy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.5% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.9%14.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.7%10.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.2%13.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos