Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video618 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Content Marketing results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, False Dilemma, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 590 hits. Analysis detected 3,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,064 of 16,562 topics). This Content Marketing is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Content Marketing
Topic details
Total words: 2,472
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 23.9%23.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 11.2%11.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.3%9.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.6%10.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos