Topic summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video491 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Content Adaptation results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 491 hits. Analysis detected 1,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,836 of 16,345 topics). This Content Adaptation is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Content Adaptation
Topic details
Total words: 1,964
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 25.0%25.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos