Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video8 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Contact Information results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 128 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 48.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (22 of 16,558 topics). This Contact Information is worse (more manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group.
Contact Information
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

100% percentile
025507510099.9% percentile
48.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 66.7%66.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 33.3%33.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 33.3%33.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 33.3%33.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 33.3%33.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 33.3%33.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 33.3%33.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Topic 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 66.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos