Topic summary
30% 6 analyzed articles/videos 6,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Technology results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 1,833 hits . Analysis detected 22,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,554 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (14,340 of 16,437 topics). This Consumer Technology is better (less manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group. Consumer Technology
Topic details
Total words: 29,554
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles29.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst