Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Consumer Scams results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 676 hits. Analysis detected 1,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,067 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Consumer Scams is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Consumer Scams
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,067
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 19.6%19.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 32.7%32.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.8%7.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.0%4.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 32.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Better Get Baquero⁠66%
NBC New York⁠79%7/18/2026, 9:25:51 AM