Topic summary
⁠13%5 analyzed articles/videos1,093 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Safety results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 921 hits. Analysis detected 5,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,042 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,323 of 15,763 topics). This Consumer Safety is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Consumer Safety
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,042
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos