Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Engagement results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 377 hits. Analysis detected 3,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (4,952 of 16,312 topics). This Consumer Engagement is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Consumer Engagement
Topic details
Total words: 2,616
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.6% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 10.7%10.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.0%6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.5%7.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 10.7%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos