Topic summary
9% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,052 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Constitutional Amendments results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Slippery Slope , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 612 hits . Analysis detected 3,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,169 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (14,301 of 15,447 topics). This Constitutional Amendments is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Constitutional Amendments
Topic details
Total words: 7,169
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst