Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conservatives results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 493 hits. Analysis detected 4,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,945 of 16,562 topics). This Conservatives is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Conservatives
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos