Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Relations results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 479 hits. Analysis detected 1,880 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,255 of 15,765 topics). This Congressional Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Congressional Relations
Topic details
Total words: 1,456
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510085.7% percentile
7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.9%32.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 32.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos