Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Reaction results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 1,145 hits. Analysis detected 6,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,739 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (2,154 of 16,562 topics). This Congressional Reaction is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Congressional Reaction
Topic details
Total words: 2,739
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.0% percentile
7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 41.8%41.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 20.3%20.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 14.1%14.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.8%14.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.5%32.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 41.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 32.5%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos