Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Races results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,621 hits. Analysis detected 12,389 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,250 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,675 of 16,562 topics). This Congressional Races is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Congressional Races
Topic details
Total words: 9,250
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.5%17.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos