Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Congressional Power results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 639 hits. Analysis detected 2,680 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Congressional Power is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Congressional Power
Topic details
Total words: 2,376
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.9%26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos