Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congestion Pricing results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 472 hits. Analysis detected 1,956 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,041 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,095 of 16,562 topics). This Congestion Pricing is worse (more manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Congestion Pricing
Topic details
Total words: 1,041
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.4% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 45.3%45.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 18.0%18.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.3%24.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.3%12.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.7%11.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 45.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.3%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Horn Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos