Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conflict Studies results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 898 hits. Analysis detected 5,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,740 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,645 of 16,562 topics). This Conflict Studies is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Conflict Studies
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,740
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos