Topic summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video1,116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Concrete results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 505 hits. Analysis detected 3,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (8,414 of 23,738 topics). This Concrete is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Concrete
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%4-H Schedule1%
⁠0%4 H Schedule1%
⁠0%Musician Biographies1%
⁠0%Class Analysis1%
⁠0%Cleveland Politics1%
⁠65%Concrete (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos