Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conan O'brien results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 296 hits. Analysis detected 553 faulty-reasoning hits from 880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,233 of 16,562 topics). This Conan O'brien is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Conan O'brien
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 880
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles880 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 33.6%33.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 6.8%6.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 33.6%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos