Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,187 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Comstock Act results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 366 hits. Analysis detected 3,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (11,031 of 16,562 topics). This Comstock Act is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Comstock Act
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,748
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos