Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video456 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Comptroller Office Modernization results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 444 hits. Analysis detected 3,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,694 of 16,562 topics). This Comptroller Office Modernization is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Comptroller Office Modernization
Topic details
Total words: 1,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.8% percentile
8.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 24.6%24.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 22.0%22.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 20.3%20.3%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.8%14.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.5%32.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 32.5%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 8.1%Composition/Division: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos