Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Comprehensive Planning results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Confirmation Bias, and False Dilemma, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 377 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,092 topics). This Comprehensive Planning is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Comprehensive Planning
Topic details
Total words: 1,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos